Information U.S.A.


U.S.A. News


Science to Prove Innocence

Law Potpourri

IIPPI Forum


General Information:

Quick Facts - U.S. Census Bureau

Bureau of Justice - Statistics
  • What's New from BJS, Bookmark this page to keep up with the latest at BJS!


  • Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)

    Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

    Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)

    Corrections

    United States Department of Justice

    National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD)

    AJS - American Judicature Society
    State Judicial Conduct Organizations
    Organizations From Each State Established To Investigate Allegations Of Misconduct By State Court Judges

    U.S. Courts

    Supreme Court of the United States of America

    How Our Laws Are Made

    Legal Resource Center/ Crime Justice Center

    Law Dictionary

    American Bar Association - Pro Bono & Public Service

    ALEC - American Legislative Exchange Council

    NCJRS - National Criminal Justice Reference Service


    http://dewine.senate.gov/statements/Remarks--Rape%20Kits%20and%20DNA%20Bill.pdf
    Advancing Justice Through DNA Technology Act of 2003
    U.S. Senator Mike Dewine, September 30, 2003

    http://www.house.gov/list/press/fl24_feeney/DNA.html
    Advancing Justice Through DNA Technology Act Passes House Judiciary Committee, October 8, 2003

    http://leahy.senate.gov/issues/ipa/index.html
    The Innocence Protection Act of 2004

    http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200410/100904E.html
    The Justice For All Act of 2004


    Federal Bureau of Prisons QUICK FACTS (September 2004)
    Number of Institutions, Total Population, Inmates by Security Level, Inmates by Gender, Inmates by Race, Inmates by Ethnicity, Inmates by Citizenship, Average Inmate Age, Sentence Imposed, Type of Offense, BOP Population Over Time/Drug Offenders as a Percentage of All Sentenced Offenders, Staff by Gender, Staff by Race/Ethnicity

    Adult Correctional Population (1980-2003)
    The number of adults in the correctional population has been increasing.
    In 2003, 6.9 million people were under some form of correctional supervision including:
    probation, prison, jail and parole
    Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics Correctional Surveys
    (The Annual Probation Survey, National Prisoner Statistics, Survey of Jails, and The Annual Parole Survey)

    Probation and Parole in the United States, 2003
    Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics

    Prison Statistics
    At yearend 2003 there were 3,405 black male prisoners per 100,000 black males in the United States in prison, compared to 1,231 Hispanic male inmates per 100,000 Hispanic males and 465 white male inmates per 100,000 white males.
    Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics

    Crime and Victims Statistics
    According to the BJS National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), in 2003:
    Violent crime rates have declined since 1994, reaching the lowest level ever recorded in 2003.
    Property crime decline through 2002 and begin to stabilize in 2003.
    (Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics)

    Uniform Crime Reports
    According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports:
    The violent crime rate decreased 3.9% from 2002 to 2003. From 1994 to 2003 the rate fell 33.4%.
    The property crime rate decreased 1.2% from 2002 to 2003. From 1994 to 2003, the rate fell 23%. The FBI's Uniform Crime Reports Program (UCR) collects information from local law enforcement agencies about crimes reported to police. The UCR crime index includes seven offenses; homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft.
    (Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics)


    2003: "With 6,600,000 in prison and jail or on probation or parole, there are 8,800,000 persons either under the control of the correctional system or employed in the criminal justice sector."
    Read full text here

    No longer are prisons correctional institutions
    2003: "California has a total population of 33 million people and 159,390 inmates. Germany has 82 million people and 56,000 inmates. Indeed, the California DOC employs nearly as many people as Germany imprisoned."
    Read full text here (pdf)


    The World Trade Organization and the Prison Industrial Complex or: To organize against the PIC is to organize against the WTO

    Prison Proliferation 1900-1995 (maps)

    The Right to Vote:
    "Many nations have disenfranchisement of sentenced prisoners, in the USA voting privileges are denied to prisoners by some states, however several others (most nations of the European Union) allow prisoners to vote, regardless of time served, nature of the crime, etc. Some countries (and U.S. states) also deny the right to vote to those convicted of serious crimes, even after they are released from prison. In some cases (e.g. the felon disfranchisement laws found in many U.S. States) the denial of the right to vote is automatic on conviction of a serious criminal offence; in other cases (e.g. provisions found in many parts of continental Europe) the denial of the right to vote is an additional penalty that the court can choose to impose, over and above the penalty of imprisonment, ...."
    Read full text here
    (Source: www.wordiq.com)
    The Sentencing Project: Felony Disenfranchisement
    The National Mail Voter Registration Form (in English and Spanish)
    Voter Registration Application (pdf)


    Huff and Partners, who are law experts, created a data base of 205 false conviction cases in the 90s and they discovered that in nearly ½ of those cases eye witnesses' misidentification played the biggest role.
    In 1 out of 10 cases perjury by witnesses or negligence by criminal justice officers were sited as other causes of false conviction.
    False or coerced confessions surfaced in almost 8% of the cases studied.
    The Huff study concluded that several causes of false conviction often worked simultaneously.
    The following observation was made:
    If we had to isolate a single "system dynamic" that pervades large numbers of cases, we would probably describe it as police and prosecutorial overzealousness:
    The anxiety to solve a case, the carelessness in which one having such anxiety is willing to believe, on smallest evidence of the most neglectful nature, that the culprit is at hand; the willingness to use improper, unethical and illegal means to obtain a conviction, when the prosecution at hand wants to believe the person accused is guilty.

    Innocence Project:
    Here you can check the statistical survey on factors leading to wrongful convictions (2001).

    "2% DNA Inclusions
    6% Other Forensic Inclusions
    15% False Confessions
    16% Informants / Snitches
    17% False Witness Testimony
    21% Microscopic Hair Comparison Matches
    23% Bad Lawyering
    26% Defective or Fraudulent Science
    34% Prosecutorial Misconduct
    38% Police Misconduct
    40% Serology Inclusion
    61% Mistaken I.D."
    (Source: Innocence Project)

    (April 2004) Study: Thousands In Prison Are Innocent
    (February 2005) New ABA Report Says Nation's Indigent Defense Systems "Mired In Crisis"

    Exonerations in the United States, 1989 through 2003 (pdf, April 2004)

    Innocence Project:
    Here you find this following information on mistaken I.D.:

    "Type of pre-trial I.D. procedure used
    (First 82 Cases), Number of incidences by procedure

    37 In-person Line-up
    45 Photo Line-up
    20 One-on-one Show-up
    2 One-on-one Photo
    8 Voice Identification
    15 Sketch
    4 Hypnosis
    10 None

    RACE OF VICTIM
    80% Caucasian
    12% African American
    5% Latino
    1% Various
    2% Unknown


    RACE OF EXONERATED DEFENDANT
    61% African American
    25% Caucasian
    12% Latino
    2% Unknown"
    (Source: Innocence Project)

    The Snitch System (pdf)
    Northwestern University School of Law/ Center on Wrongful Convictions


    Misconduct in the Judicial System
    The Complicity of Judges in the Generation of Wrongful Convictions by Hans Sherrer
    Arrested Judges
    Harmful Error Data Search
    Breaking the Rules - Who suffers when a prosecutor is cited for misconduct?
    Anatomy of Misconduct Here you read the full text of:
    "There's much to learn when a trial goes terribly wrong", By Steve Weinberg
    Lesson One: Premature conclusions can ensnare the innocent.
    Lesson Two: Lack of solid evidence does not prevent charges from being filed.
    Lesson Three: Prosecutors can tilt the system of checks and balances.
    Lesson Four: Prosecutors should cautiously evaluate testimony and confessions.
    Lesson Five: Prosecutors should not rely uncritically on their scientific and forensic experts.
    Lesson Six: Some prosecutors still withhold evidence.
    Lesson Seven: A pattern of excluding potential jurors by race or gender should raise a warning.
    Lesson Eight: Juries empowered to impose the death penalty might be more likely to convict.
    Lesson Nine: Improper opening statements and closing arguments and direct and cross-examinations can infect the fairness of a trial.
    Lesson Ten: Prosecutors should not interfere with defense access to prosecution witnesses or tamper with witnesses for either side.
    Lesson Eleven: Appellate courts sometimes ignore exculpatory evidence withheld due to misconduct.
    Lesson Twelve: Individuals from outside the criminal justice system are often the only post-conviction hope of those denied a fair hearing.
    Lesson Thirteen: Police and prosecutors sometimes do little to search for the actual perpetrators of a crime after learning the original suspect is innocent.
    (Source: The Center for Public Integrity)

    Misconduct in the Penal System
    Stanford Prison Experiment (1971) (slide show)
    A Simulation Study of the Psychology of Imprisonment Conducted at Stanford University


    © 2005 Innocent In Prison Project International

    www.iippi.org